WHEN the judge colourfully tore apart a key plank of Prince Harry’s case against The Sun this week, millions will have wearily nodded along.
Harry’s baseless claims of a supposed secret pact between us and the royals – with the late Queen’s approval – lacked “credibility”, said Mr Justice Fancourt at the High Court.
His case was “improbable” and “inherently unlikely”, his testimony “inconsistent”, “vague and limited”.
There was an “absence of any other witness or documentary evidence to support it”.
None of these criticisms will surprise anyone who has endured Harry’s dismal outpourings since he abandoned royal duties to make a living settling scores in the Californian sunshine.